LebSource

Services

Web & app development

Sometimes you do not want to hire and manage engineers. You want a product built. LebSource runs the delivery: a team, a plan you can see, and working software in your hands at the end of every sprint rather than at the end of the contract.

6things handed over and owned by you
15tools and platforms we work in on this
4stages, each one checkable before the next

01

Outsourcing Web & app development: why it goes wrong elsewhere

Almost every build agency shows you the same thing: a deck, a Gantt chart, and a demo near the end. The problem is that none of those are the product. What actually protects you is being able to use the software yourself, early and repeatedly, while there is still budget left to change direction.

The comparison

Web & app development vs an agency vs a far-shore partner

The three realistic ways to get this built, compared on the things that decide whether it lands.

When you first use working software

Partly.

A local agency

A staged demo, typically once the build is well advanced.

Partly.

A far-shore build partner

At sprint boundaries, reviewed asynchronously through screenshots and notes.

Yes.

LebSource

End of every sprint, running, in your hands, plus access to the tracker and the repository throughout.

How feedback travels

Partly.

A local agency

Through an account manager, then to the delivery team.

No.

A far-shore build partner

Written up in the evening, picked up the following day, clarified the day after.

Yes.

LebSource

Straight to the people building it, inside your working day.

Who is actually on your project

No.

A local agency

Sold by seniors, often delivered by whoever is free.

Partly.

A far-shore build partner

A named team, with turnover you find out about after the fact.

Yes.

LebSource

The people who scoped the work do the work, and you meet them before you sign.

Scope disagreements

Partly.

A local agency

Resolved by change request once the gap is discovered.

No.

A far-shore build partner

Built exactly to spec, including the parts of the spec that were wrong.

Yes.

LebSource

Assumptions and exclusions written down at scoping, so the argument happens before the code.

Taking it in-house later

Partly.

A local agency

Possible, usually a renegotiation.

Partly.

A far-shore build partner

Code handed over; the reasoning behind it frequently is not.

Yes.

LebSource

Planned from the start. Code, infrastructure, and documentation are yours throughout.

Yes.Structurally true of this modelPartly.Possible, but slower or less completeNo.Not how this model works

“Far-shore” here means a delivery team six or more hours from your working day. That is a statement about time zones, not about anyone’s ability, plenty of excellent teams work that way, and for well-scoped, low-iteration work it can be the right call. The comparison describes delivery models, not any particular firm.

How we work

What we put in writing

Every firm claims quality. These are the commitments specific enough that you would notice us breaking them.

01

We tell you when you don't need us

If a cheaper tool, a simpler approach, or no project at all is the right answer, you hear it at the scoping stage, before you have paid for a build. We would rather lose the engagement than deliver the wrong thing well.

02

Stop after any stage, keep everything

Work is sequenced so each stage stands on its own and is verifiable before the next begins. There is no point in the engagement where stopping leaves you with nothing usable.

03

You own it from day one

The code, the infrastructure, and the documentation are yours throughout, not handed over at the end, and not held as leverage. Taking the work in-house later is a planned handover, not a negotiation.

04

Your working day, not a handoff

Beirut runs on EET/EEST and shifts with the same daylight-saving changes as Europe. Questions get answered inside your day, so a blocker costs you an hour rather than a night.

05

Nothing we build fails silently

Everything ships with error handling, alerting, and a named owner. Software that breaks quietly is worse than the manual process it replaced, and we treat it that way.

06

Senior people, at up to 43% less

The saving comes from where the team sits, not from staffing your project with juniors and calling them consultants. The people scoping the work are the people doing it.

Scope

What our Web & app development services cover

Discovery and scope

We turn a brief into a scoped build with the assumptions written down, so the disagreements happen before the code does.

Design and build

Interface design and engineering in one team, working in your time zone so feedback lands the same day rather than the next.

Testing and release

Automated coverage, cross-browser and device testing, and a release process that does not depend on one person being available.

Post-launch support

An agreed support window after launch, because the first weeks in production are when the real problems surface.

Process

How our Web & app development process works

Step 01

Scope

A written scope with assumptions and exclusions made explicit.

Step 02

Design

Flows and interface, reviewed with you before engineering starts.

Step 03

Build

Sprints with working software you can use at the end of each one.

Step 04

Launch

Release, monitoring, and an agreed support period.

Fit

Who our Web & app development team is right for

Yes.Building a product without hiring a permanent team
Yes.A build that has stalled and needs finishing
Yes.Adding a mobile app alongside an existing web product
Yes.Replacing an aging product with something maintainable

Deliverables

What you get from a Web & app development engagement

Every item below is something handed over and owned by you at the end, not a description of activity.

A written scope with assumptions and exclusions stated, before engineering starts.

Interface and flow designs reviewed with you before anything is built.

Working software at the end of every sprint, on an environment you can use.

The full source in your repository, with your team's access from day one.

An automated test suite and a deployment pipeline, not just the application.

Launch support and an agreed period of post-release cover.

The stack

Tools and platforms we build Web & app development on

What we work in day to day. If your environment is not listed, it is worth asking rather than assuming.

Front end

  • React and Next.js
  • Vue and Nuxt
  • TypeScript
  • Tailwind and design systems

Back end

  • Node.js
  • Python
  • Laravel and PHP
  • .NET and Java

Mobile

  • React Native
  • Flutter
  • Native iOS and Android

Infrastructure

  • AWS and Vercel
  • Docker and Kubernetes
  • PostgreSQL and Redis
  • GitHub Actions

We work in your stack rather than moving you onto ours. Where we think a choice is wrong we will say so and explain why, then build what you decide.

Engagement

How to buy a Web & app development project

Three shapes, and we will tell you which one fits before you ask. The wrong shape is a more common cause of failure than the wrong team.

01

Fixed scope

An agreed deliverable, an agreed price, an agreed date. Works when the thing being built is genuinely well understood, which is rarer than most proposals pretend.

Best for

A defined build with stable requirements

02

Retained team

A team held for you monthly, working through a priority list you control. Scope moves as you learn without renegotiating a contract every time it does.

Best for

Ongoing work where priorities shift

03

Discovery first

A short paid piece that ends in a written scope, an architecture, and a real estimate. If the answer is that you should not build it, you get that in writing and owe nothing further.

Best for

An idea that is not yet a specification

FAQ

Web & app development with LebSource

Fixed price or time and materials?

Both are possible. Fixed price needs a tighter scope up front; time and materials suits work where the requirements will genuinely move. We will tell you which fits what you are describing.

Can we take the team in-house later?

Yes, and many clients do. The handover is planned rather than improvised, and the code and documentation are yours throughout.

How do we see progress?

Working software at the end of each sprint, plus access to the tracker and the repository. Progress is something you can use, not a status document.

Next step

Ready to build or scale your team?

Tell us what you need and we will match you with pre-vetted Lebanese professionals ready to integrate with your team.